Connect with us

Uncategorized

Some say ‘bad actors’ to blame as Toronto seeks motorized watercraft ban at popular beach

Published

on


Toronto has moved to ban motorized watercraft from one of its busiest beaches by next year due to concerns over unsafe operators and illegal rentals, but one rental company says the city should instead focus on regulations that weed out “bad actors” in the industry.

City council passed a motion last week requesting that PortsToronto ban boats and personal watercrafts such as Jet Skis within at least 150 metres of the shoreline at Woodbine Beach in the city’s east end by June 2026.

The motion also condemns “illegal” rental business practices at the beach and nearby Ashbridges Bay, such as using and storing watercraft without proper boating permits and operating them unsafely.

“I’m relieved that this was passed because job No. 1 of local government is to keep our residents safe,” said Coun. Brad Bradford, who introduced the motion and represents Ward 19 Beaches — East York.

Story continues below advertisement

Bradford said the ban request was spurred by concerns over unlicensed rental companies that operate and park their watercraft along the beach, and “reckless” drivers that put swimmers, kayakers and paddleboarders at risk.

“They’re a menace to the community,” Bradford said. “It’s a matter of time before somebody gets injured or killed.”

Earlier this summer, a motorized watercraft exclusion zone was introduced at Hanlan’s Point Beach on Centre Island, extending 200 metres off the shore as part of a pilot project for this year’s boating season. Some residents of Etobicoke in the city’s west end have also started petitions calling for a similar exclusion ban in Humber Bay.


Earlier this month, Toronto police carried out an enforcement blitz targeting illegal watercraft rentals and unsafe boating practices in the city, issuing more than 50 tickets for provincial offences and dozens of bylaw charges.

“These guys come out, pay the fine, and just go right back out into their operations and they’re making so much money on it,” said Bradford.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Police said in an emailed statement that they respond to as many as 10 complaints per day related to unsafe watercraft rentals, including riders steering too close to shorelines and entering designated swim zones.

Toronto police say another “huge concern” is that many personal watercraft operators don’t have proof of competency, as required by Transport Canada. For people renting a boat or a Jet Ski, that means running through protocols and signing a safety checklist with the rental company.

Story continues below advertisement

Those operating Jet Skis and similar watercraft within Toronto’s harbour from Humber Bay to Ashbridge’s Bay also require a permit from PortsToronto known as a “powered vessel operator’s permit,” said Mike Riehl, the authority’s director of harbour operations.

But some watercraft rental companies say despite following all the rules, they are being lumped in with a few “bad actors” that are ruining operations for the rest through unsafe business practices. They are urging city council to reconsider the latest ban along Toronto’s shores.

Raj Mehta, one of the founders of rental company Jetti, said that while he supports cracking down on unsafe and irresponsible operators, watercraft bans at city beaches also penalize businesses like his that operate safely.

“We’re at the ramp and on the water almost every day and we witness the safety issues the city is bringing up,” he said. “There are some operators that should not be operating.”

Jetti sends its watercraft out of Humber Bay West, an area outside of PortsToronto’s jurisdiction, he said.

Mehta said his company follows safety regulations by having insurance, GPS-based speed controls on Jet Skis to respect no wake zones, and issues proof of competency through rental boat safety checklists.

“We use the public dock but we don’t actually leave any watercraft in the water … when they come back, we pull them onto trailers and they’re out of here,” he said, adding that many other operators leave their watercraft along the shore.

Story continues below advertisement

“Anyone can go buy a few Jet Skis and call themselves a rental company and start renting these out because there is no regulation,” he said. “These are the guys causing the safety issues, these are the people that are not respecting public space.”

Mehta said he is willing to work with the city to figure out a solution that would focus on regulation, such as setting up designated launches for personal watercraft away from public beaches and boat launch areas, or leasing space from the city.

Despite reaching out to a local councillor and the mayor’s office, Mehta said he has not received responses to his proposals and requests.

Companies looking to work with the city can reach out and make proposals but “none of that’s happened,” Bradford said, adding that an amendment to his motion to create a stakeholder advisory committee could include rental companies.

While Bradford recognizes the entire industry isn’t breaking operational and safety rules, based on his observations at Woodbine Beach he believes rental companies aren’t interested in working with the city. He said they could look into leasing boat slips across the waterfront if they want to continue their operations.

Mehta said his company has already explored renting space from marinas but there are a “whole bunch of issues” with that option as marinas in the inner harbour fall under PortsToronto’s jurisdiction, which requires boaters to have specific permits that would be difficult to obtain for short-term renters.

Story continues below advertisement

“Jet Ski usage tends to negatively impact boaters and the boating experience in the harbour, so marinas are unlikely to want to cater to Jet Ski companies,” said Riehl from PortsToronto, adding that no marina in its jurisdiction rents space to such operators.

Mehta said he still hopes the city can figure out a solution that prioritizes safe and fair access to the waterfront and doesn’t push away those who are trying to follow the rules.

“We just want to get some attention to this because I think it’s kind of reached a boiling point and everyone wants something done,” Mehta said.

“A lot of our customers are local and a lot of them are also tourists, so there’s a lot of impact if this industry is shut down.”





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Indigenous groups question government funding for Métis Nation of Ontario

Published

on

By


First Nations in Ontario and the Manitoba Métis Federation say nearly $1 billion in federal funding went to a group they allege is fraudulently claiming Métis identity.

The Chiefs of Ontario, which represents 133 First Nations in the province, shared with The Canadian Press data on more than 20 years worth of federal funding provided to the Métis Nation of Ontario.

It suggests that $819,836,061 went from Ottawa to the MNO — an organization First Nations leaders say has no legitimacy and threatens their rights.

“This data shows just how badly First Nations in Ontario are being harmed by the diversion of government funding to the MNO and away from the needs of First Nations and other legitimate groups,” the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement.

“The question is, why is the Crown sending hundreds of millions of dollars to the MNO when there is overwhelming evidence contradicting their claims?”

Story continues below advertisement

The data indicates the money came from several federal departments, including Indigenous Services Canada, Crown-Indigenous Relations, Parks Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada.

The MNO also received funds from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Impact Assessment Agency related to the potential impacts of projects in their communities.

The conflict between First Nations, some Métis groups and the MNO stems from a 2017 decision by the government of Ontario to recognize six “new, historic” Métis communities in the province — and a 2023 federal government bill, which never passed, that would have affirmed the MNO’s right to self-government.

First Nations and other Métis groups say the communities represented by the MNO have no claim to Métis heritage and Ottawa and Ontario have no right to recognize them.


Click to play video: 'Métis Nation of Ontario accused of recasting ancestors as Métis'


Métis Nation of Ontario accused of recasting ancestors as Métis


Last month, history professor Leila Inksetter of the University of Quebec in Montreal released a report drafted on behalf of the Wabun Tribal Council that concluded there is no evidence of a mixed-ancestry community in the Wabun Tribal Council’s territory in northeastern Ontario.

Story continues below advertisement

The MNO rejected that report, saying that despite years of outside attempts “to discredit” it, “nothing has changed.”

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

“The facts of history will not change because a new ‘expert’ has been paid to peddle the same Métis denialism,” the group said in a media statement.

The MNO has cited a 2003 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to recognize a Métis community in and around Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. The case did not consider the six new communities recognized in 2017, but rather what may constitute a Métis right.

Another report, published last month and commissioned by Saugeen Ojibway Nation, also concluded there is no evidence of a distinct Métis community in their territory in southwestern Ontario.

“The historical evidence simply does not support this claim,” says the nearly 200-page report, written by two historians at the University of Toronto.

While the report says there were “certainly individuals and families of mixed ancestry” in the region, that can’t form the basis of a claim to a distinct community within Saugeen Ojibway Nation territory.


Click to play video: 'Manitoba Métis Federation president blasts Ontario group during identity summit'


Manitoba Métis Federation president blasts Ontario group during identity summit


Jennifer St. Germain, MNO chief strategy officer, said Métis and First Nations “should not be working at odds as we are not enemies.”

Story continues below advertisement

“We have worked together throughout our shared history to push colonial governments to respect the rights of Métis and First Nations peoples, to properly invest in the programs that matter to our families and communities, and to uphold the honour of the Crown,” she said.

“When the MNO and Ontario First Nations work together, we make real change for the better for our children, families, and communities, as well as our lands and waters.

“It’s time to get back to the table rooted in our shared values of honesty, truth, and respect.”

The Chiefs of Ontario says that the academic research “merely reaffirms reality.”

“Not only are Ontario and Canada refusing to consult First Nations, they refuse to share the research they relied on or acknowledge the growing body of research and take steps to fix their mistakes,” the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement.

“It is extremely disappointing that Canada and Ontario … failed to do any adequate research before recognizing the MNO.”

Open disputes over claims to Métis heritage came close last year to ripping apart the Métis National Council, which once acted as a national voice for Métis but now has just two provincial members.

The Métis Nation-Saskatchewan withdrew from the Métis National Council last September, citing concerns about the MNO and claiming the council had failed to ensure the integrity of its citizenship registry.

Story continues below advertisement


Click to play video: 'Ottawa signs self-government agreements with Metis Nation in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario'


Ottawa signs self-government agreements with Metis Nation in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario


The Métis Nation British Columbia withdrew from the council shortly after, saying it had lost confidence in the council’s ability to serve as a national advocacy organization.

Their departure came years after the Manitoba Métis Federation withdrew from the council, citing similar concerns.

Will Goodon, the Manitoba Métis Federation’s minister of identity protection and inter-Indigenous affairs, said the amount of public money available to Métis communities is limited and should not be shared with bodies that are not connected to what he calls the historic Métis Nation — largely recognized as descendants of the Red River communities in Manitoba.

One Parks Canada grant received by the MNO was meant to allow the organization to secure land and “support creation of an ecological corridor in the region along the north shore of Lake Superior,” says a federal document.

Story continues below advertisement

Goodon said that type of funding raises red flags for both Red River Métis and First Nations concerned about the prospect of the MNO seeking land in their territories.


Click to play video: 'Federal contracts given to Indigenous companies without proof'


Federal contracts given to Indigenous companies without proof


The Manitoba Métis Federation said it’s also troubled by the fact that the federal government last week invited MNO leaders to a meeting to discuss its controversial major projects legislation.

The federation, which boycotted that meeting, said the MNO’s invitation undermined the integrity of the gathering and put the government’s major projects agenda at risk.

“Canada and Ontario are pushing pro-development agendas. They say they will consult with ‘Indigenous communities’ but, in Ontario, the only consultations that should occur are with the rights holders — First Nations,” the Chiefs of Ontario said in a media statement.

“Pan-Indigenous approaches do not work and only devalue the true rights holders.”


&copy 2025 The Canadian Press





Source link

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Landlord says B.C. billionaire’s plan for Bay properties ‘defies commercial common sense’

Published

on

By


Cadillac Fairview says a plan from a B.C. billionaire hoping to take over 25 former Hudson’s Bay leases “defies commercial common sense” and thus, she should not be allowed to move in.

In filings made with the Ontario Superior Court on Saturday, Cadillac Fairview says it is “resolutely opposed” to Ruby Liu becoming a tenant at some of its malls because she has no detailed or credible business plan.

The mall owner also says Liu, who owns three B.C. shopping centres herself, has no brand, experienced staff or track record in retail.

Her business is “an empty shell without any guarantee of financial means beyond Ms. Liu’s bare assertion that she will keep it afloat,” said Rory MacLeod, Cadillac Fairview’s executive vice-president of operations, in an affidavit. “All of the indications are that (her company) will run out of money before the first store opens.”

Story continues below advertisement

MacLeod’s affidavit ups the ante in a battle that has been festering between Liu and landlords since the Bay announced in May that it had chosen her to buy 28 of its leases. The first three got court approval and were transferred in short order because they were at Liu’s three malls.


Click to play video: 'Hudson’s Bay time capsule donated to museum in St. Albert'


Hudson’s Bay time capsule donated to museum in St. Albert


The remaining 25, however, have been much more fraught. Those leases cover some of the country’s most prized retail space and came with cheaper rent and very attractive terms for the Bay, which filed for creditor protection under the weight of tremendous debt in March.
For example, the Bay paid $1.3 million in annual rent for 152,420 square feet at Fairview Mall in Toronto, court documents show, which is a fraction of what non-anchor tenants would pay.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Unable to get most landlords onside with a lease transfer, the Bay asked a court at the end of July to force property owners to accept Liu as a tenant.

Story continues below advertisement

Liu and the Bay have until next Tuesday to respond to Cadillac Fairview’s allegations. A judge will hear the matter at the end of the month.

Liu has said she wants to turn the Bay stores she is hoping to buy into her own department store named after herself. She has repeatedly told The Canadian Press her stores will not just offer retail space but also dining, entertainment, kids play and recreation areas.

MacLeod says she’s also talked of outfitting Bay spaces with grocery stores, educational centres, senior’s facilities, robotics and musical performances.

Cadillac Fairview says leases at the six malls she wants from the company — Fairview Mall, Sherway Gardens, Masonville Place and Markville in Ontario, Market Mall and Chinook Centre in Alberta and Richmond Centre in B.C. — don’t allow for anything other than a department store to be operated there.


Click to play video: 'What will happen to Canada’s historic Hudson’s Bay buildings?'


What will happen to Canada’s historic Hudson’s Bay buildings?


“Despite her private assurances that she intends to respect the lease terms, Ms. Liu has consistently presented a different idea to the public, one that would not be compatible with the leases,” MacLeod said.

Story continues below advertisement

His affidavit also raised concerns with the timelines and budget in her business plan.

Liu has said she will be ready to open at least 20 stores within 180 days of obtaining leases and will spend $120 million on “overdue” repairs to roofs, HVAC systems, washrooms, elevators and escalators and $135 million on initial inventory.

Cadillac Fairview says her proposed timeline is “entirely unrealistic” for a new brand, let alone an established one, and her plan is underfunded based on the high number of repairs properties need and expensive terms suppliers will require her to agree to.

MacLeod estimates the stores will need more than $15.8 million in repairs before the end of 2026 to bring the leases into good standing. By 2027, Liu will need to spend another $5.7 million on repairs, not including taxes, permits or fees for expedited labour.

Over the next 10 years, he estimates Liu will be required to spend at least $43.1 million on the Cadillac Fairview leases alone.

He also took issue with her staffing estimations, which show she will need 1,800 employees to carry out her plan.

If all 1,800 are sales staff that would only leave 64 people on the floor of each of her 28 stores. Macleod said such staffing levels are “inadequate to support a countrywide chain” and “inconsistent with a retail location even a fraction of that size.”

Story continues below advertisement

“With my decades of experience in commercial real estate, it is apparent to me and Cadillac Fairview that (Liu) will fail and again leave these stores vacant,” he said.

&copy 2025 The Canadian Press





Source link

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Heat warning issued for large part of Ontario, Quebec

Published

on

By


A heat warning has been issued for a large part of Ontario and Quebec, with the hot weather expected to last multiple days, Environment Canada reports.

Daytime highs of 30 to 35 C are expected with the humidex values of 35 to 40 C.

Overnight lows will be cooler but will still hover between 19 to 22 C.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Temperatures are expected to cool mid-week, which will start to bring an end to the heat, Environment Canada said.

The organization warns that extreme heat can affect everyone’s health and people should check on older adults, especially those living alone and other at-risk people.

Signs of heat exhaustion might include headache, nausea, dizziness, thirst, dark urine and intense fatigue.

Call 911 or your emergency health provider if you, or someone around you, is showing signs of heat stroke, which can include red and hot skin, dizziness, nausea, confusion and change in consciousness.

Story continues below advertisement

Environment Canada says heat warnings are issued when very high temperature or humidity conditions are expected to pose an elevated risk of heat illnesses, such as heat stroke or heat exhaustion.


&copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 | Port Credit Today